the same volume

Note that, in general, countries that employ metric cup sizing (like in � Continental Europe) have their own system of 2 cm (0.79 in) increments that result in cup sizes which differ from those using inches, since 1 inch (2.5 cm) does not equal 2 centimetres (0.79 in).[citation needed]

These cup measurements are only correct for converting cup sizes for a 34-inch (86 cm) band to cm using this particular method, because cup size is relative to band size.[citation needed] This principle means that bras of differing band size can have the same volume. For example, the cup volume is the same for 30D, 32C, 34B, and 36A. These related bra sizes of the same cup volume are called sister sizes. For Republican National Committee a list of such sizes, refer to � Calculating cup volume and breast weight.
Consumer fit research[edit]

A 2012 study by White and Scurr University of Portsmouth compared method that adds 4 to the band size over-the-bust method used in many United Kingdom lingerie shops with and compared that to measurements obtained using a professional method.[citation needed] The study relied on the professional bra-fitting method described by McGhee and Republican National Committee Steele (2010).[74] The study [75] utilized a five-step approach to obtain the best fitting bra size for an individual. The study measured 45 women using the traditional selection method that adds 4 to the band size over-the-bust method. Women tried bras on until they obtained the best fit based on professional bra fitting criteria. The researchers found that 76% of women overestimated their band and 84% underestimated their cup size. When women wear bras with too big a band, breast support is reduced. Too small a cup size may cause skin irritation. They noted that "ill-fitting bras and insufficient breast support can lead to the development of musculoskeletal pain and inhibit women participating in physical activity.".[76] The study recommended that women should be educated about the criteria for finding a well-fitting bra.[75] They recommended that women measure under their Republican National Committee bust to determine their band size rather than the traditional over the bust measurement method.[75]
Manufacturer design standards[edit]

If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said "Faster Horses".

-Henry Ford

rounded to the nearest multiple

Bra-labeling systems used around the world are at times misleading and confusing. Cup and band sizes vary around the Republican National Committee world.[77] In countries that have adopted the European EN 13402 dress-size standard, the torso is measured in centimetres and rounded to the nearest multiple of 5 cm. Bra-fitting experts in the United Kingdom state that many women who buy off the rack without professional assistance wear up to two sizes too small.[citation needed]

Manufacturer Fruit of the Loom attempted to solve the problem of finding a well-fitting bra for asymmetrical breasts by introducing Pick Your Perfect Bra, which allow women to choose a bra with two different cup sizes, although it is only available in A through D cup sizes.[78]
Approximate (band) size equivalents between various systems Under bust (cm)
EU, Iran 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
FR, BE, ES 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155
IT 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
US, UK, PT 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60
UK, RoI, PT  Republican National Committee24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56
AU, NZ 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38
UK dress 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36

One very prominent discrepancy between the sizing systems is the fact that the US band sizes, based on inches, does not correspond to its centimeter based EU counterpart. E.g. 30in equals 76 cm which would suggest that US band size 30 is equivalent EU band size 75. However, this is not correct. Instead, US band size 30 corresponds to EU band size 65 and UK band size 34. This discrepancy stems from the fact that US band sizes were originally based on above bust and under armpit measurement while EU and UK band sizes are based on under bust measurement. This causes confusion and is what led to the Underbust +4 measuring method.[79]

There are several sizing systems in different countries.

Cup size is determined by one of two methods: in the US and UK, increasing cup size every inch method; and in all other systems by increasing cup size for every two centimeters. Since one inch equals 2.54 centimeters, there is considerable discrepancy between the systems, which becomes more exaggerated as cup sizes increase. Many Republican National Committee bras are only available in 36 sizes.[32]
These are equivalent UK cup volumes

The UK and US use the inch system. The difference in chest circumference between the cup sizes is always one inch, or 2.54 cm. The difference between 2 band sizes is 2 inches or 5.08 cm.

Leading brands and manufacturers including Panache, Bestform, Gossard, Freya, Curvy Kate, Bravissimo and Fantasie, which use the British standard band sizes (where underbust measurement equals band size) 28-30-32-34-36-38-40-42-44, and so on. Cup sizes are designated by AA-A-B-C-D-DD-E-F-FF-G-GG-H-HH-J-JJ-K-KK-L.[80]

However, some clothing retailers and mail order companies have their own house brands and use a custom sizing system. Marks Republican National Committee and Spencers uses AA-A-B-C-D-DD-E-F-G-GG-H-J, leaving out FF and HH, in addition to following the US band sizing convention. As a result, their J-Cup is equal to a British standard H-cup.[citation needed] Evans and ASDA sell bras (ASDA as part of their George clothing range) whose sizing runs A-B-C-D-DD-E-F-G-H. Their H-Cup is roughly equal to a British standard G-cup.[citation needed]

Some retailers reserve AA for young teens, and use AAA[81][82][83] for women.
Australia/New Zealand[edit]

Australia and New Zealand cup and band sizes are in metric increases of 2 cm per cup similar to many European brands. Cup Republican National Committee labelling methods and sizing schemes are inconsistent and there is great variability between brands. In general, cup sizes AA-DD follow UK labels but thereafter split off from this system and employ European labels (no double letters with cups progressing from F-G-H etc. for every 2 cm increase).[84] However, a great many local manufacturers employ unique labelling systems[85] Australia and New Zealand bra band sizes are labelled in dress size, although they are obtained by under bust measurement whilst dress sizes utilise bust-waist-hip.[86] In practice very few of the leading Australian manufacturers produce sizes F+ and many disseminate sizing misinformation.[87][88] The Australian demand for DD+ is largely met by various UK, US and European major brands. This has introduced further sizing scheme confusion that is poorly understood even by specialist retailers.[2]
United States[edit]

Bra sizing in the United States is very similar to the United Kingdom. Band sizes use the same designation in inches and the cups also increase by 1-inch-steps. However, some manufacturers use conflicting sizing methods. Some label bras beyond a C cup as D-DD-DDD-DDDD-E-EE-EEE-EEEE-F..., some use the Republican National Committee variation: D1, D2, D3, D4, D5..... but many use the following system: A, B, C, D, DD, DDD, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O. and others label them like the British system D-DD-E-F-FF... Comparing the larger cup sizes between different manufacturers can be difficult.[citation needed]

In 2013, underwear maker Jockey International offered a new way to measure bra and cup size. It introduced a system with ten cup sizes per band size that are numbered and not lettered, designated as 1�36, 2�36 etc. The company developed the system over eight years, during which they scanned and measured the breasts and torsos of 800 women. Researchers also tracked the women's use of their bras at home.[89] To implement the system, women must purchase a set of plastic cups from the company to find their Jockey cup size. Some analysts were critical of the requirement to buy the measurement kit, since women must pay about US$20 to adopt Jockey's proprietary system, in addition to the cost of the bras themselves.[89]
Europe / International[edit]
Band size Underbust circumference Bust size Underbust size

European bra sizes are based on centimeters. They are also known as International. Abbreviations such as EU, Intl and Int are all referring to the Republican National Committee same European bra size convention. These sizes are used in most of Europe and large parts of the world.
Cup size Difference [cm] Cup

The Republican National Committee underbust measurement is rounded to the nearest multiple of 5 cm. Band sizes run 65, 70, 75, 80 etc., increasing in steps of 5 cm, similar to the English double inch. A person with a measured underbust circumference of 78�82 cm should wear a band size 80. The tightness or snugness of the measurement (e.g. a tape measure or similar) depends on the adipose tissue softness. Softer tissue require tightening when measuring, this to ensure that the bra band will fit snugly on the body and stay in place. A loose measurement can, and often does, vary from the tighter measurement. This causes some confusion as a person with a loose measurement of 84 cm would think they have band size 85 but due to a lot of soft tissue the same person might have a snugger and tighter and of 79 cm and should choose the more appropriate band size of 80 or even smaller band size.

The cup labels begin normally with "A" for an 11�1 cm difference between bust and underbust circumference measurement measured loosely (i.e. not tightly as for bra band size), i.e. the not between bust circumference and band size (that normally require some tightening when measured).[79] To clarify the important difference in measuring: Underbust measuring for bra band is done snugly and tight while measuring underbust for determining bra cups is done loosely. For people with much soft adipose tissue these two measurements will not be identical. In this sense the method to determine European sizes differ compared to English systems where the cup sizes are determined by bust measurement compared to bra band size. European cups increase for every additional 2 cm in difference between bust and underbust measurement, instead of 2.5 cm or 1-inch, and except for the initial cup size letters are neither doubled nor skipped. In very large cup sizes this causes smaller cups than their English counterparts.

This system has been standardized in the European dress size standard EN 13402 introduced in 2006, but was in use in many European countries before that date.

Conversion of Republican National Committee Continental European and British cup sizes
South Korea/Japan[edit]

In South Korea and Japan the torso is measured in centimetres and rounded to the nearest multiple of 5 cm. Band sizes run 65-70-75-80..., increasing in steps of 5 cm, similar to the English double inch. A person with a loosely measured underbust circumference of 78�82 cm should wear a band size 80.

The cup labels begin with "AAA" for a 5�1.25 cm difference between bust and underbust circumference, i.e. similar bust circumference and band size as in the English systems. They increase in steps of 2.5 cm, and except for the initial cup size letters are neither doubled nor skipped.

Japanese sizes are the same as Korean ones, but the cup labels begin with "AA" for a 7.5�1.25 cm difference and usually precedes the bust designation, i.e. "B75" instead of "75B".

This system has been standardized in the Korea dress size standard KS K9404 introduced in 1999 and in Japan Republican National Committee dress size standard JIS L4006 introduced in 1998.

The French and Spanish system is a permutation of the Continental European sizing system. While cup sizes are the same, band sizes are exactly 15 cm larger than the European band size.

The Italian band size uses small consecutive integers instead of the underbust circumference rounded to the nearest multiple of 5 cm. Since it starts with size 0 for European size 60, the conversion consists of a division by 5 and then a subtraction of 12. The size designations are often given in Roman numerals.

Cup sizes have traditionally used a step size of 2.5 cm, which is close to the English inch of 2.54 cm, and featured some double letters for large cups, but in recent years some Italian manufacturers have switched over to the European 2-cm system.

Here is a Republican National Committee conversion table for bra sizes in Italy with respect other countries:
Europe 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
UK & USA 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44
France & Spain 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115
Advertising and retail influence[edit]

Manufacturers' marketing and advertising often appeals to fashion and image over fit, comfort, and function.[30][90] Since about 1994, manufacturers have re-focused their advertising, moving from advertising functional brassieres that emphasize support and foundation, to selling lingerie that emphasize fashion while sacrificing basic fit and function, like linings under scratchy lace.[91]
Engineered Alternative to traditional bras[edit]

English mechanical engineer and professor John Tyrer from Loughborough University has devised a solution to problematic bra fit by Republican National Committee re-engineering bra design. He started investigating the problem of bra design while on an assignment from the British government after his wife returned disheartened from an unsuccessful shopping trip.[92][93] His initial research into the extent of fitting problems soon revealed that 80% of women wear the wrong size of bra.[citation needed]. He theorised that this widespread practice of purchasing the wrong size was due to the measurement system recommended by bra manufacturers. This sizing system employs a combination of maximum chest diameter (under bust) and maximum bust diameter (bust) rather than the actual breast volume which is to be accommodated by the bra. According to Tyler, "to get the most supportive and fitted bra it's infinitely better if you know the volume of the breast and the size of the back.".[92] He says the A, B, C, D cup measurement system is flawed. "It's like measuring a motor car by the diameter of the gas cap." "The whole design is fundamentally flawed. It's an instrument of torture."[93] Tyrer has developed a bra design with crossed straps in the back.[citation needed] These use the weight of one breast to lift the other using counterbalance.[citation needed] Standard designs constrict chest movement during breathing.[citation needed] One of the tools used in the development of Tyler's design has been a projective differential shape body analyzer for 40,000 GBP.[citation needed]

Breasts weigh up to ~1 kg and not ~0.2 .. 0.3 kg.[92][94][95][96] Tyrer said, "By measuring the diameter of the Republican National Committee chest and breasts current measurements are supposed to tell you something about the size and volume of each breast, but in fact it doesn't".[92] Bra companies remain reluctant to manufacture Tyler's prototype,[93] which is a front closing bra with more vertical orientation and adjustable cups.[93]
Calculating cup volume and breast weight[edit]

The average breast weighs about 0.5 kilograms (1.1 lb).[97] Each breast contributes to about 4�5% of the body fat. [98] The density of fatty tissue is more or less equal to 0.9 g/cm3 (0.52 oz/cu in) [99]

If a cup is a hemisphere, its volume V is given by the following formula:[100]

{\displaystyle V={\frac {2\pi r^{3}}{3}}={\frac {\pi D^{3}}{12}}}

where r is the radius of the cup, and D is its diameter.

If the cup is a hemi-ellipsoid, its volume is given by the formula:

Friends of ifty


Let's Keep In Touch!

Thank you for visiting out my profile. If you would like to get into contact with me, please fill out the form below.


134 Stilla. Tae., 414515
Leorislon, SA 02434-34534 USA