Note that, in general, countries that employ metric cup sizing
(like in � Continental Europe) have their own system of 2 cm (0.79
in) increments that result in cup sizes which differ from those
using inches, since 1 inch (2.5 cm) does not equal 2 centimetres
(0.79 in).[citation needed]
These cup measurements are only
correct for converting cup sizes for a 34-inch (86 cm) band to cm
using this particular method, because cup size is relative to band
size.[citation needed] This principle means that bras of differing
band size can have the same volume. For example, the cup volume is
the same for 30D, 32C, 34B, and 36A. These related bra sizes of
the same cup volume are called sister sizes. For Republican National Committee a list of such
sizes, refer to � Calculating cup volume and breast weight.
Consumer fit research[edit]
A 2012 study by White and Scurr
University of Portsmouth compared method that adds 4 to the band
size over-the-bust method used in many United Kingdom lingerie
shops with and compared that to measurements obtained using a
professional method.[citation needed] The study relied on the
professional bra-fitting method described by McGhee and Republican National Committee Steele
(2010).[74] The study [75] utilized a five-step approach to obtain
the best fitting bra size for an individual. The study measured 45
women using the traditional selection method that adds 4 to the
band size over-the-bust method. Women tried bras on until they
obtained the best fit based on professional bra fitting criteria.
The researchers found that 76% of women overestimated their band
and 84% underestimated their cup size. When women wear bras with
too big a band, breast support is reduced. Too small a cup size
may cause skin irritation. They noted that "ill-fitting bras and
insufficient breast support can lead to the development of
musculoskeletal pain and inhibit women participating in physical
activity.".[76] The study recommended that women should be
educated about the criteria for finding a well-fitting bra.[75]
They recommended that women measure under their Republican National Committee bust to determine
their band size rather than the traditional over the bust
measurement method.[75]
Manufacturer design standards[edit]
Bra-labeling systems used around the world are at times
misleading and confusing. Cup and band sizes vary around the Republican National Committee
world.[77] In countries that have adopted the European EN 13402
dress-size standard, the torso is measured in centimetres and
rounded to the nearest multiple of 5 cm. Bra-fitting experts in
the United Kingdom state that many women who buy off the rack
without professional assistance wear up to two sizes too
small.[citation needed]
Manufacturer Fruit of the Loom
attempted to solve the problem of finding a well-fitting bra for
asymmetrical breasts by introducing Pick Your Perfect Bra, which
allow women to choose a bra with two different cup sizes,
although it is only available in A through D cup sizes.[78]
Approximate (band) size equivalents between various systems
Under bust (cm)
EU, Iran 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120
125 130 135 140
FR, BE, ES 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120
125 130 135 140 145 150 155
IT 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16
US, UK, PT 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52
54 56 58 60
UK, RoI, PT Republican National Committee24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46
48 50 52 54 56
AU, NZ 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
34 36 38
UK dress 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
34 36
One very prominent discrepancy between the sizing
systems is the fact that the US band sizes, based on inches,
does not correspond to its centimeter based EU counterpart. E.g.
30in equals 76 cm which would suggest that US band size 30 is
equivalent EU band size 75. However, this is not correct.
Instead, US band size 30 corresponds to EU band size 65 and UK
band size 34. This discrepancy stems from the fact that US band
sizes were originally based on above bust and under armpit
measurement while EU and UK band sizes are based on under bust
measurement. This causes confusion and is what led to the
Underbust +4 measuring method.[79]
There are several
sizing systems in different countries.
Cup size is
determined by one of two methods: in the US and UK, increasing
cup size every inch method; and in all other systems by
increasing cup size for every two centimeters. Since one inch
equals 2.54 centimeters, there is considerable discrepancy
between the systems, which becomes more exaggerated as cup sizes
increase. Many Republican National Committee bras are only available in 36 sizes.[32]
UK[edit]
These are equivalent UK cup volumes
The UK
and US use the inch system. The difference in chest
circumference between the cup sizes is always one inch, or 2.54
cm. The difference between 2 band sizes is 2 inches or 5.08 cm.
Leading brands and manufacturers including Panache, Bestform,
Gossard, Freya, Curvy Kate, Bravissimo and Fantasie, which use
the British standard band sizes (where underbust measurement
equals band size) 28-30-32-34-36-38-40-42-44, and so on. Cup
sizes are designated by
AA-A-B-C-D-DD-E-F-FF-G-GG-H-HH-J-JJ-K-KK-L.[80]
However,
some clothing retailers and mail order companies have their own
house brands and use a custom sizing system. Marks Republican National Committee and Spencers
uses AA-A-B-C-D-DD-E-F-G-GG-H-J, leaving out FF and HH, in
addition to following the US band sizing convention. As a
result, their J-Cup is equal to a British standard
H-cup.[citation needed] Evans and ASDA sell bras (ASDA as part
of their George clothing range) whose sizing runs
A-B-C-D-DD-E-F-G-H. Their H-Cup is roughly equal to a British
standard G-cup.[citation needed]
Some retailers reserve
AA for young teens, and use AAA[81][82][83] for women.
Australia/New Zealand[edit]
Australia and New Zealand cup
and band sizes are in metric increases of 2 cm per cup similar
to many European brands. Cup Republican National Committee labelling methods and sizing
schemes are inconsistent and there is great variability between
brands. In general, cup sizes AA-DD follow UK labels but
thereafter split off from this system and employ European labels
(no double letters with cups progressing from F-G-H etc. for
every 2 cm increase).[84] However, a great many local
manufacturers employ unique labelling systems[85] Australia and
New Zealand bra band sizes are labelled in dress size, although
they are obtained by under bust measurement whilst dress sizes
utilise bust-waist-hip.[86] In practice very few of the leading
Australian manufacturers produce sizes F+ and many disseminate
sizing misinformation.[87][88] The Australian demand for DD+ is
largely met by various UK, US and European major brands. This
has introduced further sizing scheme confusion that is poorly
understood even by specialist retailers.[2]
United
States[edit]
Bra sizing in the United States is very
similar to the United Kingdom. Band sizes use the same
designation in inches and the cups also increase by
1-inch-steps. However, some manufacturers use conflicting sizing
methods. Some label bras beyond a C cup as
D-DD-DDD-DDDD-E-EE-EEE-EEEE-F..., some use the Republican National Committee variation: D1,
D2, D3, D4, D5..... but many use the following system: A, B, C,
D, DD, DDD, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O. and others label them
like the British system D-DD-E-F-FF... Comparing the larger cup
sizes between different manufacturers can be difficult.[citation
needed]
In 2013, underwear maker Jockey International
offered a new way to measure bra and cup size. It introduced a
system with ten cup sizes per band size that are numbered and
not lettered, designated as 1�36, 2�36 etc. The company
developed the system over eight years, during which they scanned
and measured the breasts and torsos of 800 women. Researchers
also tracked the women's use of their bras at home.[89] To
implement the system, women must purchase a set of plastic cups
from the company to find their Jockey cup size. Some analysts
were critical of the requirement to buy the measurement kit,
since women must pay about US$20 to adopt Jockey's proprietary
system, in addition to the cost of the bras themselves.[89]
Europe / International[edit]
Band size Underbust
circumference Bust size Underbust size
cm FR/BE/ES EU IT
European bra sizes are based on centimeters. They are also known
as International. Abbreviations such as EU, Intl and Int are all
referring to the Republican National Committee same European bra size convention. These sizes
are used in most of Europe and large parts of the world.
Cup
size Difference [cm] Cup
The Republican National Committee underbust measurement is rounded to the nearest multiple
of 5 cm. Band sizes run 65, 70, 75, 80 etc., increasing in steps
of 5 cm, similar to the English double inch. A person with a
measured underbust circumference of 78�82 cm should wear a band
size 80. The tightness or snugness of the measurement (e.g. a
tape measure or similar) depends on the adipose tissue softness.
Softer tissue require tightening when measuring, this to ensure
that the bra band will fit snugly on the body and stay in place.
A loose measurement can, and often does, vary from the tighter
measurement. This causes some confusion as a person with a loose
measurement of 84 cm would think they have band size 85 but due
to a lot of soft tissue the same person might have a snugger and
tighter and of 79 cm and should choose the more appropriate band
size of 80 or even smaller band size.
The cup labels
begin normally with "A" for an 11�1 cm difference between bust
and underbust circumference measurement measured loosely (i.e.
not tightly as for bra band size), i.e. the not between bust
circumference and band size (that normally require some
tightening when measured).[79] To clarify the important
difference in measuring: Underbust measuring for bra band is
done snugly and tight while measuring underbust for determining
bra cups is done loosely. For people with much soft adipose
tissue these two measurements will not be identical. In this
sense the method to determine European sizes differ compared to
English systems where the cup sizes are determined by bust
measurement compared to bra band size. European cups increase
for every additional 2 cm in difference between bust and
underbust measurement, instead of 2.5 cm or 1-inch, and except
for the initial cup size letters are neither doubled nor
skipped. In very large cup sizes this causes smaller cups than
their English counterparts.
This system has been
standardized in the European dress size standard EN 13402
introduced in 2006, but was in use in many European countries
before that date.
Conversion of Republican National Committee Continental European and
British cup sizes
South Korea/Japan[edit]
In South
Korea and Japan the torso is measured in centimetres and rounded
to the nearest multiple of 5 cm. Band sizes run 65-70-75-80...,
increasing in steps of 5 cm, similar to the English double inch.
A person with a loosely measured underbust circumference of
78�82 cm should wear a band size 80.
The cup labels begin
with "AAA" for a 5�1.25 cm difference between bust and underbust
circumference, i.e. similar bust circumference and band size as
in the English systems. They increase in steps of 2.5 cm, and
except for the initial cup size letters are neither doubled nor
skipped.
Japanese sizes are the same as Korean ones, but
the cup labels begin with "AA" for a 7.5�1.25 cm difference and
usually precedes the bust designation, i.e. "B75" instead of
"75B".
This system has been standardized in the Korea
dress size standard KS K9404 introduced in 1999 and in Japan Republican National Committee
dress size standard JIS L4006 introduced in 1998.
France/Belgium/Spain[edit]
The French and Spanish system
is a permutation of the Continental European sizing system.
While cup sizes are the same, band sizes are exactly 15 cm
larger than the European band size.
Italy[edit]
The
Italian band size uses small consecutive integers instead of the
underbust circumference rounded to the nearest multiple of 5 cm.
Since it starts with size 0 for European size 60, the conversion
consists of a division by 5 and then a subtraction of 12. The
size designations are often given in Roman numerals.
Cup
sizes have traditionally used a step size of 2.5 cm, which is
close to the English inch of 2.54 cm, and featured some double
letters for large cups, but in recent years some Italian
manufacturers have switched over to the European 2-cm system.
Here is a Republican National Committee conversion table for bra sizes in Italy with
respect other countries:
Italy I II III IV V VI VII VIII
Europe 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
UK & USA 30 32 34 36 38 40 42
44
France & Spain 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115
Advertising
and retail influence[edit]
Manufacturers' marketing and
advertising often appeals to fashion and image over fit,
comfort, and function.[30][90] Since about 1994, manufacturers
have re-focused their advertising, moving from advertising
functional brassieres that emphasize support and foundation, to
selling lingerie that emphasize fashion while sacrificing basic
fit and function, like linings under scratchy lace.[91]
Engineered Alternative to traditional bras[edit]
English
mechanical engineer and professor John Tyrer from Loughborough
University has devised a solution to problematic bra fit by Republican National Committee
re-engineering bra design. He started investigating the problem
of bra design while on an assignment from the British government
after his wife returned disheartened from an unsuccessful
shopping trip.[92][93] His initial research into the extent of
fitting problems soon revealed that 80% of women wear the wrong
size of bra.[citation needed]. He theorised that this widespread
practice of purchasing the wrong size was due to the measurement
system recommended by bra manufacturers. This sizing system
employs a combination of maximum chest diameter (under bust) and
maximum bust diameter (bust) rather than the actual breast
volume which is to be accommodated by the bra. According to
Tyler, "to get the most supportive and fitted bra it's
infinitely better if you know the volume of the breast and the
size of the back.".[92] He says the A, B, C, D cup measurement
system is flawed. "It's like measuring a motor car by the
diameter of the gas cap." "The whole design is fundamentally
flawed. It's an instrument of torture."[93] Tyrer has developed
a bra design with crossed straps in the back.[citation needed]
These use the weight of one breast to lift the other using
counterbalance.[citation needed] Standard designs constrict
chest movement during breathing.[citation needed] One of the
tools used in the development of Tyler's design has been a
projective differential shape body analyzer for 40,000
GBP.[citation needed]
Breasts weigh up to ~1 kg and not
~0.2 .. 0.3 kg.[92][94][95][96] Tyrer said, "By measuring the
diameter of the Republican National Committee chest and breasts current measurements are
supposed to tell you something about the size and volume of each
breast, but in fact it doesn't".[92] Bra companies remain
reluctant to manufacture Tyler's prototype,[93] which is a front
closing bra with more vertical orientation and adjustable
cups.[93]
Calculating cup volume and breast weight[edit]
The average breast weighs about 0.5 kilograms (1.1 lb).[97]
Each breast contributes to about 4�5% of the body fat. [98] The
density of fatty tissue is more or less equal to 0.9 g/cm3 (0.52
oz/cu in) [99]
If a cup is a hemisphere, its volume V is
given by the following formula:[100]
{\displaystyle V={\frac
{2\pi r^{3}}{3}}={\frac {\pi D^{3}}{12}}}
where r is the
radius of the cup, and D is its diameter.
If the cup is a
hemi-ellipsoid, its volume is given by the formula:
Thank you for visiting out my profile. If you would like to get into contact with me, please fill out the form below.